Dynamometer software working with roller chassis dynamometer has a difficult task to complete. It directly measures power that is transferred from vehicle to the dynamometer, but you or your customer says: I’m not interested in power on wheels. What power does my engine have?
Let’s see where the engine power goes on chassis dynamometer and how the engine power is calculated.
The dynamometer and its controller measures roller speed, roller acceleration and absorber torque. From this information it can precisely calculate power absorbed by Dyno elements inertia and Absorber. Sum of these in Dyno2 software is named “Power on wheels“. If you have done a good job calibrating the load cell and provided accurate dyno connected inertia values, power on wheels will be an accurate measured value.
Now the fun part begins, because as you can see on the diagram, there is a long way from “Power on wheels” to “Power on engine” with lot of stuff going on along the way.
First thing on the way is Free rotation loss. It’s a power that is lost on wheel-roller contact patch and in drivetrain components when whole assembly is freely rotating. It’s calculated during coast down phase after power measurement, when whole assembly is decelerating nearly without power transfer.
To calculate it, the software needs information about deceleration rate and about whole assembly inertia. Deceleration is measured and dyno inertia is known. Only thing missing is Drivetrain elements inertia. We have some luck here, because most inertia comes from rotating elements that has the largest diameter. We can get some quite good inertia estimate from vehicle wheel diameter.
Second power loss along the way is a loss from power transfer on wheel-roller patch. We take it from experimental data and it is around 8% of the transferred power.
Third one is power transfer loss in gearbox. Easiest one is the common manual gearbox or automatized manual gearbox. It looses around 4% of transferred power. The hardest one are hydrokinetic gearboxes. Not only these has much larger range of loss percent (or efficiency) but also the efficiency depends highly on amount of power that is transferred.
Last enemy on the road is Engine elements inertia. In measurements other than steady state, it absorbs part of generated power. It can be roughly estimated from engine displacement. If engine inertia value is correct, engine power measured on different gears should be the same.
What can I do to get most accurate engine power calculation on chassis dyno?
- Use a dyno which has high roller inertia. By maximizing the inertia you know precisely, you can minimize unknown inertia estimation error influence on engine power result.
- Use a dyno with absorber that can support steady state measurement. When whole vehicle – dyno assembly is rotating at constant speed, power is not transferred to and from inertia.
- Take care to fill all inertia and losses values. If you get them right, calculated engine power will also be right.
How all this looks like in the software?
- Power on wheels – power measured by dynamometer
- Loss power from speed – power loss that is measured during coast down phase – free rotation loss
- Loss power from load – power that is lost due to power transfer efficiency – both in drivetrain and on tire-roller patch
- Drivetrain inertial power – power that is being accumulated in drivetrain inertia – mainly vehicle wheels
- Engine inertial power – power that is being accumulated in engine inertia – mainly engine flywheel
- Loss power = Loss power from speed + Loss power from load + Drivetrain inertial power + Engine inertial power
- Engine power = Power on wheels + Loss power
Some questions that may arise
Why “Loss power” on your dyno is different than on other software? Why are there bumps on “Loss power” in main chart. Why it falls at the end. Shouldn’t it be smooth and rise up to the end?
Loss power in main chart is a sum of loss from speed, loss from load, power lost to accelerate drivetrain, power lost to accelerate engine flywheel. Because some of these are a fraction of generated engine power, all fluctuations of engine power will be partly reflected on this curve.
Loss power from speed, that is measured in coast down phase should be smooth and rise up to the end. You can see this curve in bottom chart (curve 2).
Other software may show only loss measured during coast down phase and add other losses to “Power on wheels” or “Power on engine”.
Some software will just compensate other losses with higher inertia value in dyno configuration. With this approach engine power result will still be correct for typical vehicles, but it may be inaccurate for some configurations.
Why “Loss power” and “Power on wheels” change if I make short inertial only run or long run with absorber and slow acceleration?
Loss power from speed (curve 2) measured during coast down will not change. Total loss power (curve 6) which also contains power used to accelerate engine flywheel and vehicle wheels will. To explain this, lets calculate simple example:
Rotational inertia of two typical 60cm car wheels: ~2kg*m²
Kinetic energy accumulated in these two wheels when running at 200km/h: 34kJ
Average power needed to accelerate the wheels in 10 seconds = 34kJ / 10s = 3.4kW
Average power needed to accelerate the wheels in 60 seconds = 34kJ / 60s = 0.6kW
As you can see during fast inertial only run, vehicle drivetrain inertia consumes more engine power. This power is added to “Loss power” (curve 6) and subtracted from “Power on wheels” (curve 1).
In longer run with absorber, less power (not less energy) goes to accelerate vehicle drivetrain. This power will go to the dyno and it will increase “Power on wheels” reading.
Of course these calculated average power values are a big simplification, as the power consumed by wheels rotational inertia is not constant across the run.
This effect is also a reason why inertial dynamometers that don’t take flywheel inertia into account will show higher engine power after change to light flywheel. Of course with light flywheel, your car will accelerate faster because during acceleration power available at wheels will be greater, but the flywheel didn’t change static engine power output.